![]() WikiWikiPhil ( talk) 15:59, 13 April 2012 (UTC) Reply Feeling bold, I've made this change. ![]() I agree that video capability is a rather arbitrary choice for the sole feature to highlight, but shading by DIGIC chip would retain this info as the video models are all DIGIC 4 or later. We could do a similar thing with background colour to indicate DIGIC 1,2,3,4,5. Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.88.187.75 ( talk) 21:56, 21 February 2010 (UTC) Reply This page on a Canon rumour site has a very similar table to this template (not sure who copied whom), but uses different colours to distinguish the DIGIC chip revision. Also, from now on, every camera will probably have video, so in the future there will be no need. When features like this are not indicated in the timeline then video shouldn't either. There are other features that I think is more or equally important (sensor-size, body construction (weather sealing), FPS etc.). The timeline doesn't say anything about the specifications of the cameras except for the video function, and I find it very strange that a feature like that is the only feature that's shown. ![]() I don't know how to edit this, but I strongly suggest that someone remove the green background behind the cameras with video capabilities. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |